The subject of UFOs is the perhaps the most controversial subject I will analyze here.
My personal "Pros"
Before I developed the Speed-of-Light Definition of Time and the Ball-of-Light Particle Model, my personal beliefs on UFOs were: I did not believe one report on abductions -- not one; I felt it was possible -- a very slight possibility -- that humans were placed here on earth and that it was possible that space travelers had visited us a few times to check on us -- in the past -- but not recently; I found particularly compelling the "Nazca Lines" in Peru that have geometrical patterns that can only be perceived from the air; I also found compelling a stone carving -- Myan?, Aztec? -- of a god wearing what looks like a space suit sitting in what looks like a space ship. It is a fact this carving is old. It has, in my opinion, too much detail to coincidentally look like modern space technology.
Graphic (if you have a copyright released jpeg of this please E-mail me.)
My personal "Cons"
The best argument I have heard of against visitors from space is the inconspicuousness of our sun. Our star is not bright, nor unique. I see little reason that a scientist from another world would spot our star, and be compelled to visit it.
Now that I have developed the Speed-of-Light Definition of Time and the Ball-of-Light Particle Model, my personal beliefs on UFOs are:
- I feel even more certain that it is unlikely that space travelers are currently visiting us. And if they had in the past, I believe, their home planet must be relatively close to us. If we have been visited, I believe it must be from a location where our sun would appear to them to be quite bright. This is the only likely reason I've heard of that would explain why our star would have attracted the attention of distant scientists -- it might have developed some historical interest over the course of their development.
- My understanding of time and physics has nothing to offer to those who dream of traveling back in time or who dream of traveling faster than the speed of light. I really love shows like Star Trek and movies like Star Wars. I've watched them since I was a child. However, in my mind, I can distinguish which parts are pure fantasy, and which parts are physically possible. Time travel is just not possible.
- I still do not believe any stories of alien abductions. To me they all, I repeat all, sound like hoaxes, fantasies or dreams. If one of them had described something with advanced physics that now can be described by the Ball-of-Light Particle Model, then I might have believed it. (I am sorry, I will not respond to E-mail on this topic.)
- However, I do believe in hundreds of observations of Unidentified Flying Objects because I believe I now can identify them. I believe, almost all reports of UFOs, that are not man-made or are hoaxes, have been observations of, you guessed it, balls-of-light.
The Ball-of-Light Particle Model Description of UFOs
Graphic of NGC 4565 (page 358)
Graphic of NGC 4594 (page 357)
The galaxy NGC 4565 is sometimes called the "flying saucer" galaxy for a good reason. Its decay mode is exactly the same as many observed decaying balls-of-light that have been called UFOs -- only the scale is different. The decay modes of a decaying ball-of-light can be predicted and categorized from the Ball-of-Light Particle Model.
A spherical ball-of-light that enters the atmosphere can develop a nonharmonic region around its equator. The nonharmonic fields can induce other particles. These particles would tend to spin around the equator -- giving the sphere a disk-like appearance. The whole object would appear to glow due to photons released by the core ball-of-light and from photons released by secondary decaying particles.
All of the following "classic observations" of UFOs would equally apply to decaying balls-of-light:
- It appeared as a bright light.
- It had bright lights.
- It had different colors.
- It was spherical in shape.
- It was shaped like a flying saucer.
- It was shaped like a large bright ball with small balls of different colors spinning around its center.
- It was spinning.
- It had a fuzzy bright exterior.
- It had patches of lights of different colors spinning around it.
- It had darker patches around it (interpreted as windows).
- It came from the sky.
- It came from space.
- It appeared suddenly.
- It disappeared quickly.
- It exploded.
- It traveled fast.
- It traveled slow.
- It changed direction quickly.
- It hovered.
- They appeared in groups
- They are attacking the White House
- When it split into different parts, they changed direction at 90 degrees and sped apart at supersonic speeds. (It could not have been a plane or jet) [A decaying ball-of-light can split and change directions like this.]
- At first it was one object, then it split into: two, three, many objects. [A decaying ball-of-light can split and change directions like this.]
- It vanished.
- Where it landed there were burn marks on the ground.
- Where it landed there was evidence of radiation burns on surrounding objects.
- Where it landed there was no evidence of radioactivity.
- Where it landed there were strange geometrical marks in the crops. [See also, Crop Circles.]
- Where it landed the grass or crops were burnt and the stems were all matted down in a circular pattern as if the object was spinning. [See also, Electron Spin.]
- Where it landed there were no deep indentations in the ground that showed evidence of a space crafts landing feet, it was if the object hovered.
- Where it entered the water there was bubbling and boiling. [See also, Ball Lightning.]
- It looked like it landed behind the: hill, trees, house, etc. but when we got there it was gone.
- Under the water it appeared bright, then the light went out. But when we went Scuba diving, we could not find the sunken spacecraft or any alien bodies.
- It hit the water, there was fizzling and bubbles, underwater searching revealed there was no debris.
- It was attracted to some metal object.
- It burnt the roof of my car and my car stopped working.
- I tried to drive away from it but it seemed to be attracted to my car and followed me.
- It appeared on radar, then vanished.
- My military jet couldn't keep up with it.
- I tried to shoot it down but couldn't.
- I shot it down, it exploded but we couldn't find any debris.
- It landed in our military compound.
- It evaded our security.
- It exploded in our military compound.
- We took video of bright lights in our military compound.
- Our jet tried to intercept it by crashing into it and they both exploded. (I'm just guessing here. Such an incident would be top secret of course -- but known to top military officials. I hoping one will have the guts to contact me.)
- It passed through our plane and left burn marks on it. (Again, I am just guessing here. But this has been observed in commercial airliners with respect to Ball Lightning.)
For those advocates of UFOs who believe the government has been covering up UFOs, I believe you are correct. With the Ball-of-Light Particle Model's description of these objects you can now understand why! Imagine what it must be like for a military leader, or some General who hears or sees reports like this! Their security is breached, the objects come out of nowhere, they have not been "captured," they explode, they can travel faster than any of our best planes, they can turn with such high "g's" that it seems impossible, they don't know "who" made them, they know they didn't make them, and so on!
Furthermore, you can guess this happens throughout the world. You know other governments have their own teams researching this. You know our spies have reported on their research projects. You know these objects are not being dreamed up. There is 100's of millions, perhaps billions of dollars being spent on their research.
What you don't hear of, or at least have reliable reports of, with respect to UFOs is:
- "It landed here, and it is still sitting here, come and look at it!"
- "It landed here, and it left this rover here to explore our planet!"
- "It landed here, and left this scientific equipment here to test our planet!"
- "It landed here, and aliens came out, here they are. Would you like to meet them?!"
- "When I was abducted, they taught me, or, I learned how to do something so advanced no one else on earth knows how to do this. Here, let me show you what it is and how you can do it."
- "It crashed here, see its debris?"
- "It crashed here, see their remains?"
- "They have communicated with us, this is what they said...! Would you like to talk with them now?"
I will believe any reports with tangible or physical proof.
The Ball-of-Light Particle Model Description of Crop Circles
Photo of a simple circular crop circle.
Crop Circles have become a topic of their own. The Ball-of-Light Particle Model predicts they are caused by a ball-of-light, most likely from Solar Ball Lightning rather than Terrestrial Ball Lightning, that lands in a field of crops and decays in a "fizzle" decay mode. This is probably the most common decay mode. Basically, it is a ball-of-light sitting there spinning -- emitting photons as it does -- where the top hemisphere is spinning one way, and the bottom hemisphere is spinning the other way.
Graphic of ball lightning making a simple circular crop circle.
Burn marks (radiation effects) are a result of the radiation coming from the decaying ball-of-light. As far as I know, no crop circles have shown indications of radioactivity. This is because no radioactive elements are involved. (UFO believers thought, in the early days, that maybe they should find radioactivity in a crop circle from the exhaust of the UFO. Kind of like how our cars give off pollution!)
Sometimes groups of crop circles are found because these balls-of-light can decay or split into multiple objects before they land.
Sometimes straight lines are formed because they can roll. Sometimes spiral patterns are found because they can roll with a spin as they decay. Sometimes, a series of circles going from large to small can be found because the ball-of-light decays from the original large ball-of-light to smaller ones.
Graphic of complex crop circles
Sometimes really bizarre crop circles are found because the people who make them desperately trying to get attention are bizarre.
Are these figures made by people here on earth to signal space travelers? I love this idea, but there just is not enough to go on from a scientific point-of-view. At least at this time.
Thumbnail Graphics of Nazca Lines.
Did the Mayans carve these images in rocks originally to depict space travelers that they really met? I also love this idea, but there just is not enough to go on from a scientific point-of-view. At least at this time.
Thumbnail Graphics of Mayan Glyphs